Drastically reducing again on caloric consumption to reduce weight forward of competitors is commonplace amongst athletes. Nonetheless, such a ‘weight-reduction plan’ doesn’t simply diminish performances, it might probably additionally compromise their immune techniques. These are the findings of a brand new research from the College of Copenhagen.
Whether or not chosen to swim, row or run within the Olympics, or gearing as much as trip within the Tour de France, attaining the ‘proper’ weight has been a focus of many elite athletes for many years. It might be to look lean and imply in a swimsuit or jersey, or to qualify for a sure weight class. However there may be additionally a perception that shedding pounds enhances efficiency.
As such, it’s a widespread phenomenon amongst athletes – particularly in endurance sports activities like working, swimming, biking and rowing – to scale back their dietary consumption within the run-up to competitors.
It’s significantly problematic amongst feminine endurance athletes. Many athletes focus closely on weight of their respective sports activities. Consequently, they have a tendency to enter short-term, however intense intervals of weight reduction with the expectation of performing higher.”
Professor Ylva Hellsten of the College of Copenhagen’s Division of Diet, Train and Sports activities
She and PhD scholar Jan Sommer Jeppesen are two of the researchers behind a brand new research on the consequences of low vitality availability amongst feminine athletes.
“We all know that the phenomenon of not consuming sufficient is related to many issues which are dangerous to well being – together with missed intervals, compromised bone well being and adjustments in metabolism. However there may be nonetheless loads that we do not know. As such, we investigated a number of the doable penalties extra carefully,” says Jeppesen, who’s the research’s lead creator.
Diminished biking efficiency
For the research, the researchers recruited twelve feminine triathletes, all of who had a traditional vitality consumption. Throughout one a part of the trial, the athletes got sufficient energy for 14 days, after which their efficiency was examined. The identical athletes additionally went by means of a 14-day interval throughout which they consumed solely about 50% of their vitality wants whereas sticking to their regular intensive coaching schedule.
Through the interval with inadequate energy, athletes misplaced a median of roughly 4% of their physique weight, about half of which was muscle mass. They usually skilled a loss in efficiency:
“The fourteen days of inadequate meals consumption diminished their efficiency by 7.7% in a 20-minute time trial on a motorbike, which is kind of vital. And through a extra intense short-term take a look at, their efficiency slid by as a lot as 18%. So there is no such thing as a doubt that this follow enormously impairs one’s efficiency as an athlete, even over shorter intervals of time,” says Jan Sommer Jeppesen.
Weaker immune system
Along with sports activities efficiency, the researchers examined the consequences on athletes’ immune perform:
“Amongst different issues, we noticed that inadequate vitality consumption was related to elevated systemic stress. The athletes had a big enhance in cortisol, a stress hormone, and a dramatically elevated stress stage in immune cells. This means that there’s a fairly extreme affect on a number of points of the immune system if one would not eat sufficient. This may occasionally doubtlessly contribute to athletes being extra uncovered to sickness,” says Jeppesen.
The researchers hope that the outcomes of the research will assist create extra consciousness of the phenomenon:
“Many coaches proceed to stress athletes to reduce weight. For a few years, it has been part of the tradition within the sports activities world – and stays so. We have to make clear the phenomenon and ask critically: What are we truly doing to our athletes each bodily and psychologically?” says Ylva Hellsten.
Crew Denmark to make use of the outcomes
Crew Denmark, the Danish elite sport organisation, welcomes the brand new analysis outcomes with open arms.
“It focuses on a extremely vital subject and challenges the angle that lighter is all the time higher. The idea and tradition stays prevalent in lots of sports activities. I expertise many athletes who trim their weight within the weeks main as much as a contest, however with out understanding the results of doing so,” says Majke Jørgensen, a sports activities nutritionist and supervisor at Crew Denmark.
She sees the outcomes as helpful data that may help a message that Crew Denmark has been making an attempt to advertise:
“My expertise is that elite athletes and coaches are curious, however want analysis that backs up any critiques of the phenomenon. Right here, the truth that the take a look at topics are precise athletes is a serious energy, in order that the outcomes may be transferred to the athletes and coaches that Crew Denmark helps. We are going to use these outcomes to help what we’re already making an attempt to speak, each once we sit down with athletes one-on-one, in addition to throughout workshops and displays in a lot of these contexts,” says Jørgensen.
Three days of refeeding doesn’t assist
After fourteen days of low vitality availability (LEA), the athletes underwent a three-day “refeeding” interval as a part of the trial, throughout which they have been supplied loads to eat.
“We had anticipated that the three days of sufficient meals would restore their efficiency – and possibly even enhance it – however there was completely no impact. Their efficiency was simply as degraded as previous to the three days. This tells us that the unfavourable results can’t be reversed by rapidly replenishing vitality shops, which is a method utilized by many athletes,” says Jeppesen.
Ladies extra weak than males
In response to the analysis literature, males are typically extra resilient in the case of inadequate vitality consumption.
“Based mostly upon the relatively restricted analysis on this space, it appears that evidently males are capable of tolerate diminished vitality consumption earlier than it impacts us negatively. This means that ladies specifically are a weak inhabitants on this respect,” says Jan Sommer Jeppesen.
The gender distinction is partly attributable to the truth that low vitality availability could cause a girl’s estrogen ranges to drop drastically. Since estrogen protects the circulatory system, muscle mass and bones, and so forth., estrogen loss has intensive results on a girl’s physiology. Ylva Hellsten factors out that the dangerous results of not consuming sufficient for lengthy intervals of time, particularly in ladies, can subsequently even be lifelong.
Supply:
Journal reference:
Jeppesen, J. S., et al. (2024). Low vitality availability will increase immune cell formation of reactive oxygen species and impairs train efficiency in feminine endurance athletes. Redox Biology. doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2024.103250.